The Lies of Billy the Kid and his Court-Buddy Crooks
A Typical Day in California's Family Courts
An account of how seven lawyers, two private mediators, three psychologists, two supervisors, a play therapist, and a Cartoonist made $120KKK from one little kid. And how Family Court crooks allowed the "most nitpicky client" Ms. Ospeck ever had to run wild for over five years and tried to coerce a Father to Worship them – and their court-games: after robbing him of over $50,000 and confiscating all $45,000 in “Child Support” that he paid to poor Mom -- who outspent him by approx. $25,000. And how Apathetic, Dishonest, and Greedy Officials think they’re doing kids favors by Robbing their parents, running up their Credit Cards, slandering them in Court, and then taking one of them away.
“To show partiality in judgment is not good.”
King Solomon; Proverbs 24:23-25
“Minor’s Counsel’s report generally is for the best interest of the child; but it’s also to really try to come to grips with the father’s living situation and whether there’s any obvious danger for the child.”
Judge Hendrix, 2-09-06 P. 35:4-8
We are dealing with “minor parenting issues…” and “the father’s interactions with Rayna, … did not lead (me) to believe that the child (is) at risk or in danger in any way.”
Bob Lesh, 4-04-2006, P. 5:19; and 3-15-06; P. 6:15-23
“So…unsupervised is fine outside that household.” And “My client has NO OPPOSITION to the schedule… just… THAT Particular Household …”
Bill Benjamin, 2-09-06; P. 5:28 – 6:1. P.6: L.11-13.
“This is all about Rayna.”
Dr. Robert J. Fox: who did not want to meet her, nor make any external contacts, but only listen to constant complaints: for $250/hr – and do so four times as often as Miss Ospeck.
“You have to wonder, when CERTAIN Individuals have child abuse charges,
or false charges, associated with almost EVERY case they take.”
A lawyer who knows Bill Benjamin: and the San Diego Family Courts
The above statement was said to me right after I explained that Mr. Benjamin and his client had accused me of child abuse without even bothering to make a phone call to inquire about what happened: where my daughter hid in a Suitcase as a game of hide-and-seek while I was in the bathroom and played in it for about two minutes. And three months later she said to her mom that Daddy let her play in “one of those” when she saw a suitcase in her mom’s garage. And then Mom was certain she had the Smoking Gun she had been DILIGENTLY LOOKING for with a microscope for over three years. It was the 4th time that I was falsely accused of child abuse, and it was not to be the last.
This incident involved three different STOP signs, and Mr. Benjamin ran them all: on or before our Feb. 9, 2006 hearing. And six months after the incident – at our April hearing – he LOUDLY SHOUTED OUT in court that I had put my daughter in a suitcase and should be Supervised. This could have been taken care of with a phone call either to me or CPS, but it wasn’t because Mr. Benjamin instructed his client NOT to call to ask any questions.
This incident also demonstrates the kind of person Mr. Benjamin is: someone who is not only careless, but thinks he can purchase little kids, and who USES them to commit Extortion, and makes false charges and tells Lies in court: right in front of the Judge's nose, while demanding that the court hold the Child ransom for more MONEY, by ordering up Supervision for virtually any reason: such as reading your kid a Bible Story on Sunday morning from her Children’s Bible instead of taking her to church: at her request.
For example, if a parent wants to stop Playing the Private Mediation / “Let’s play around with your Money” GAME, he or she will very likely be told to go see a therapist or put under Supervision. Or if a parent actually runs out of MONEY, or -- after over 30 “mediations” over 3.5 years – he (or she) grows weary of listening to his (or her) former spouse’s lies and complaints, and watches as the “mediator” catches him (or her) telling a “Big One,” but does Nothing about it, he or she will likely lose his or her kids. That’s because the San Diego Family Courts are, first and foremost, in the Business of Making Money. If this were not the case then they would take false charges of abuse seriously: and especially when they occur again and again and when they are obviously false. But then again, if they are ignored, or pooh-poohed, then more and more and more and more $$$$$ can be made from families that are being chopped up and destroyed: and the Lieyers and PM's know this.
As a result of Apathy, Greed, and ZERO Accountability for Court Officials, Billy and his Buddies have turned the Family Courts into a Child Auction Service rather than a Court. And WHEN a parent runs out of Money, or catches court officials telling Lies, they join together in slandering that parent and assert that there must be something wrong with him, and threaten to take his child away if he doesn’t bow down and worship them by continuing to PAY more Money to their Crooks while they nitpick, tell lies, and take notes.
I know because they did it to me for reading my daughter a 5-10 minute Bible Story from her Children’s Bible on Sunday morning instead of taking her to church. And no, this isn’t “Ripley’s Believe it or Not,” but the San Diego Family Courts.
The incident above – where my daughter was SOLD to her Mom because I read her a Bible Story – began with another one of Mr. Benjamin Lies. This time he wrote on an Ex Parte Form that notification was “Not Timely” when in fact it was not even provided.
This was at the Sept. 13, 2006 hearing that was held in my absence: and in spite of the fact that on the day before I called my former spouse to ask if she and Billy were planning to hold a Hearing without notifying me. And She refused to say anything and told me to call Billy. So I called Mr. Benjamin’s office, and he also refused to speak with me and didn’t return my call until AFTER THE HEARING was over on the next day: to inform me that he and his client had just Kidnapped Rayna and would be (falsely) accusing me of Child Abuse for a 5th time: this time they would say I was planning to commit murder and suicide because Jesus is coming back this week or next (???).
Why Mr. Benjamin does such things I cannot say: perhaps he doesn’t realize that his words and actions are being recorded for the Day of Judgment: when we will all stand before Jesus Christ and be judged for our words and deeds, and for things we didn’t say or do because we were selfish, cowardly, or apathetic: Heb. 9:27; Prov. 15:3; Jer. 17:10-13; Matt. 7:21-27; 12:36; John 5:22-23; Rom. 2:11-16; 2 Cor. 5:10; Rev. 20:11-15? Or perhaps it’s because Mr. Benjamin has mental disorders that need to be looked at?
Ever since we separated, my former spouse has told lies about me: including Five False Charges of Abuse, and numerous others. And when high conflict parent with money was caught Fibbing by Miss Ospeck, Miss Ospeck (took notes but) forgot where she put them, and so she could not remember the most important thing that she had found out about high conflict parent with money: i.e. that she tells lies with a straight face, and does so in almost every session. I have since endured about 10 more sessions with Dr. Fox, and since he was worse than Miss Ospeck, I had to leave the scam artists to fend for themselves: meaning that I fired them, and they were not happy about that. I have since documented Nine of high conflict parent's Lies in a declaration titled “Nine Lies that Respondent has told to the court or its officials,” but to no avail.
More of Mr. Benjamin’s LIES are documented below.
Mr. Benjamin: “This court… said: ‘Don’t allow your child to have any contact with this convicted domestic violence perpetrator who lives in the same home.’” 2-9-06; P.4; Line 21-24 Emphasis Added
Mr. Benjamin’s statement was incorrect since my former roommate was not convicted of anything, See P. 5; Lines 5-11. In fact, his former girlfriend later apologized for the trouble she had caused.
But because Ed was immature, he didn’t want to talk Miss Ospeck about what happened, and was upset when she called and woke him up. And a month of two later, when the transmission went out in his car, he told me he would “talk nice” to Miss Ospeck if I would “Loan” him the money to fix it, and I said NO. And because Miss Ospeck refused to show me a little respect, and speak with my other two roommates, and because I wanted to keep my Sunday visits, I decided to keep looking for another place to live.
And less than a month after Billy said I was NOT going to Move, I moved. But Billy and Ms. B. were still not happy, so they convinced Bob to ask for “couple’s therapy” with the “most nitpicky client” Miss Ospeck ever had: at the hands of a Fox: who makes $250 per hour for doing the same thing over and over. But let’s get back to Billy and his Lies.
Mr. Benjamin: So…unsupervised is fine outside that household.” And: “My client has no opposition to the schedule… : just… THAT Particular Household with those individuals…”
2-09-06; P. 5:28 – 6:1. P.6: L.11-13. Emphasis Added
Less than a month after Bill Benjamin made those statements, I moved out of THAT HOUSEHOLD and into another House.
And two months later, at our April hearing, the same Bill Benjamin Loudly puffed out that because I had pah, pah, “put” my daughter in a “suitcase” I should be “supervised.” And he did so in spite of the fact that he, himself instructed his client not to make a phone call to ask me about the incident, nor to call CPS. Mr. Benjamin also concealed this incident from the Judge when he was specifically asked what he had against me at our Feb 9th 2006 hearing: the SAME DAY that his client filed a declaration mentioning this incident. And two months later – because I had grown tired of reading ANYTHING that high conflict parent with money said and did not even bother respond to her latest round of “bullets,” Billy assumed that it would be OK to make another False Charge of Abuse over something that (at his request) was not investigated by a single phone call.
If anything it is Mr. Benjamin, himself, who should be SUPERVISED: or put in Jail for Kidnapping.
The April transcript has since been ALTERED to conceal what Mr. Benjamin said, and to make Bob look like a Hero for saving Rayna from Evil Ed. More details are given below.
This was the 4th False accusation of child abuse by my former spouse. And on this occasion Mr. Benjamin instructed his client NOT to make a phone call to verify what took place six month earlier – in a span of about two minutes: where Rayna hid in a suitcase that was lying on my bed: a suitcase that I was using to LOCK UP a computer from a nosey roommate. Rayna did so as a game of Hide-and-Seek.
This is an example of how high conflict parent with money and her attorney go far out of their way to not find out the facts, and/or to twist what the think they can get away with. It also demonstrates Billy’s “shoot-from-the-hip” style: without bothering to check who, or what, he’s shootin.
In this instance, Mr. Benjamin bypassed me, CPS, and the Judge to take the accusations to court in a Declaration filed by his client on Feb 9th 2006: Item 30-something of her LONG LIST of distorted complaints. And when asked by Judge Hendrix what he had against me at our Feb. 9th, 2006 hearing, Billy said nothing of the incident, but complained about my giving Rayna a bite of turkey burger. 2-09-06; P. 10:7-11, 14-18.
Mr. Benjamin tells MORE LIES.
Mr. Benjamin: “He keeps associating with the same sorts of people… What are the chances that you would rent a place and EVERY TIME … you’ve got someone who’s either involved with domestic violence, … drug or alcohol problems EVERY TIME… This is the history of this case.” P. 10:25-11:3 Emphasis Added
Whether or not Mr. Benjamin was on drugs when he said this or high conflict parent with money told him to say it, I cannot say, but it was another Lie: for the previous house I lived in had two roommates who were squeaky clean, as did the house I moved to later that month, and as does the current house where I now live. In other words, Bill Benjamin has a propensity to say things that are verifiably false, and to do so in Court: perhaps because he knows that the judges don’t really care what he says or does, as long as the bills get paid?
Mr. Benjamin and Politics: “This is a guy who believes every Democrat is a non-Christian, fervently.” 2-09-06; P. 18:28-19:1
If Five Lies Don’t Work, Tell some MORE. It not only works in Politics, but also Family Court. Mr. Benjamin’s statement is again untrue since (at least) four of my former co-workers were Christians, and Democrats. And because I am virtually certain Zell Miller is a Christian, and a Democrat. One of my sisters is also a Christian and (the last time I checked) a Democrat, even as was one of my former roommates.
With that said, I do think that we are headed down the path toward Sodom and Gomorrah, and that the Democrats and the Mass Media are leading the way, and that God will judge us if we don’t stop spitting in His face. For EVERY homosexual (and lesbian) has BOTH a Mother AND a Father: for THAT is the way we were Designed. Christians don’t Hate Gays, nor do we seek to label the facts of biology and the way that our Creator made us as “Hate Speech.” To the contrary, the Lord told us to “Love our enemies” (Matt. 5:43-48) and pray for them, and to warn people to repent (Luke 13:1-5), and to put their trust in the only one who can save us from our sins: John 6:37-40; 8:24; 14:6, 23; Acts 4:12.
Mr. Benjamin: “Instead he says: ‘I don’t care how dangerous it is in that household, I’m not going to back down. I don’t care if I don’t get overnights,” for $2800/month “I’m not going to back down…” Why “That’s” just plain “wrong. And I don’t think he is going to back down…” “He has the ability to move… and he chooses not to… That is not parenting.” 2-09-06; P. 19:9-19; 19:25-20:1. Slightly Modified for clarity.
Fact: Less than a Month after THAT HEARING I MOVED out of that household and into another House: in a vain attempt to please the high conflict parent with money, but the harassment by her and Billy the Kidnapper (a.k.a William M. Benjamin) did not stop. For Billy got Bob Lesh on his team and together they asserted that high conflict parent with money and her ex were in dire need of “couples therapy” … and that the Fox could Fix them up. And shortly afterward Dr. Fox began to do the EXACT SAME THING that Miss Ospeck had done: only four times as often: i.e. “So what (complaints) do you have for us today ... ?”
Dr. Fox even informed me that the reason we were having “problems after the marriage” was “because of things that happened during the marriage”; however, IF he had bothered to ask he would have found out that it was what didn’t happen during the marriage that was so upsetting to high conflict parent with money: i.e. She wanted another child and I said No because I thought we were headed for a Divorce. She also wanted to change me into a TV addict like her.
Dr. Fox also did not even want to meet Rayna: whom he said this whole thing was “all about,” nor to see her and I together, nor to talk to the lady I was living with, nor to make any external contacts. He also went out of his way to cover up for high conflict parent with money, with regard to two (distorted) “instances” of my not giving Rayna her medication. And for this and other Lies he told, I Lost Respect for him and for the Private Mediation Money Scam.
For example: “He put his daughter in a suitcase. He should be SUPERVISED” – SPOKEN VERY LOUD -- was changed to: “His idea is to put the child in a suitcase and drag her into his apartment… It was not until Mr. Lesh appeared in this case that he moved from that place.” April 10, 2006; P. 17:22-26.
Although both statements contain some truth, they were made without making an effort to investigate the facts, and the second statement couldn’t possibly be true for I lived in a house with three other roommates: not an apartment. The second statement is also NOT what Billy said that day. For his words were spoken with such enthusiasm and VOLUME that they were permanently etched in my brain, and what he said was:
“He put his daughter in a suitcase: He should be Supervised.”
So why would Mr. Benjamin not tell the Judge about the suitcase incident when asked what he had against me at our Feb. 9th 2006 hearing? If he or his client thought that I was abusing Rayna, then why wait two more months to bring it to the court’s attention?
Was it because he instructed his client not to make a phone call, to verify what took place, nor to call CPS? Or was it because Mr. Benjamin has mental problems???
Mr. Benjamin is not a kid anymore, and he knows the proper procedure for investigating charges of abuse. He also should have known that his client has a propensity to tell lies, and that she called CPS on me twice before, and the charges were investigated and found to be False.
The September 15th and September 27th 2006 Transcripts have also been altered.
At our July 11th 2006 hearing it was decided that Dr. Fox would write a report for our next review hearing that was scheduled for Oct. 10th of 2006. This was again spelled out at the Sept. 15th Ex Parte hearing that I asked for because Mr. Benjamin and high conflict parent with money attempted to KIDNAP Rayna two days before at a hearing that I was not invited to attend. This took place less than a week after I let go of my second attorney: Richard Kolek (of two years): i.e. 2 yrs of Bowman + 2 yrs of Kolek = $45,000 = No More $$$$$$$$$ for Lawyers.
So I went back to court two days later to take a stand for Rayna and for who I am: i.e. her father: not that that means much to the Family Friendly (IF you have Money) Court, but once in a while some Judges can see through the Fog (of lies and distortions), and the fact that I was not even notified of the hearing… and so my visitation was reinstated. And it was again spelled out at that hearing that Dr. Fox would write a report for our Oct. 10, 2006 review hearing, and I told him so on the following Saturday when we met for 30 minutes.
However, all mention of Dr. Fox’s report has been deleted from the (9/15/06) Transcript.
What high conflict parent with money and Mr. Benjamin did at the Sept. 13, 2006 hearing was nothing short of attempted kidnapping.
I also asked Judge Hendrix at our Sept. 27th hearing to wait until we received Dr. Fox’s report before making any decisions: 9-27-06; P.12, L.9-11. And right afterward Mr. Lesh got up and informed the Judge that there wasn’t going to be a report because (according to Bob) Dr. Fox said that I “stormed” down his hallway. And although my statement is in the transcript, Mr. Lesh’s has been Deleted.
So instead of a report, we have (a) hearsay (Lie) from Bob: for as I walked out of Dr. Fox’s office, he followed me down the hall and was trying to tell me what a bad person I was for walking out. I have since asked Dr. Fox to put something in writing however he has refused to do so. See my Feb. 17, 2008 letter to Dr. Fox: that he refused to sign for.
More Slander by Mr. Benjamin:
The behavior as explained by Mr. Berg… is at best a reach.” 9-27-06; P. 3:1-3.
No Mr. Benjamin, what high conflict parent with money had just falsely accused me of through your office was at best “a reach.”
My former spouse convinced Billy that because I could no longer afford a Lawyer to represent me, and because I dared to tell my daughter that I believe that Jesus is coming back to the Earth in the next few years, that I must be serial murderer, or a psycho-nutcase who is planning to commit murder and suicide, when in reality I would rather write Essays for Jesus and pass them out to friends and file them with the Court, or put them on my web site. For we only have so much time on Planet Earth, and then our lives are OVER. And once they’re OVER, we can’t go back and live them OVER again, or do things differently: Heb. 9:27; Matt. 7:21-23; Rev. 3:20. And if we end up on the wrong side of the Lord on that day, we will not be able to blame anyone but ourselves.
The thought had never even occurred to me to harm myself (or anyone else) because I think that the Lord is coming back. It does, however, show how low that high conflict parent with money and Billy the Kidnapper will go to falsely accuse me, and that they have NO FEAR at all of the court.
high conflict parent with money had asserted that Rayna was afraid when I discussed my beliefs with her on this subject; however, that was not the case, nor was she “afraid” when I told her that God’s invisible Spirit will come upon those who ask Him to save them: John 6:37; 14:16-27. Rom. 8:9-11; Eph. 1:13-14; Rev. 3:20. Nor was Rayna scared when we discussed this in the presence of Dr. Robinson and Miss McCutchan. See Mr. Lesh’s comment below.
Bob Lesh: “Mr. Berg (brought)… his daughter (to see) Dr. Robinson and Miss McCutchan… and Miss McCutchan… feels comfortable that the child is … not… so concerned about what was told to her by her father, and from Miss McCutchan’s report, that was a positive meeting…” 9-27-06; P. 6:11-20
So if Rayna was afraid, it was because her mother twisted what I said to something like: “You mean Daddy lives in a Haunted House with Ghosts?” “You must be really scared to go to his house…” That’s because she tells lies: as Miss Ospeck saw but didn’t tell.
What Mr. Benjamin and high conflict parent with money did should raise eyebrows, for it was the 5th time that high conflict parent with money had falsely accused me of abusing Rayna, and why I believe she and Billy have some Serious Mental Problems that need to be looked at.
The fact that high conflict parent with money made the accusation publicly tells me that there is something wrong with her. And as soon as I got wind of what she and Billy were up to I called her and tried talking to her, but she just told me to call Billy: who was also Mum when I did.
Now it was time for their Next Trick.
And so for the 5th Time in less than five years, high conflict parent with money Falsely Accused me of Child Abuse; but if you were to Ask Bob it never even happened: nor did the previous four. And when I pointed this out in court at our Sept. 27th 2006 hearing Mr. Lesh simply ignored the facts. This is discussed in the upcoming section on Bob Lesh.
So for Mr. Benjamin to state that what I told my daughter was “at best a reach” tells me that he either has his eyes closed to what is going on in the world, that he has mental problems, or that he was on mind-altering drugs???
How Billy got the court to Hold Rayna Ransom: for MORE of Dad’s MONEY.
Because high conflict parent with money asserted that I “scared” my daughter, Billy told the Judge that this had to stop. So at our Sept. 27th hearing the Judge put on his Pope Hat and said: “…you will not be the religious teacher of this child” and to “keep your religious beliefs to yourself.” Judge Hendrix, 9-27-06; P. 16:7-8, and P. 16:25-26
It is not for the court to usurp God’s place by seeking worshippers, nor by telling parents they can’t talk to their own children about the Lord: and especially since that is what the Scriptures instruct parents to do. See Matt. 22:21; Deut. 4:9; 6:6; 11:19; Eph. 6:4.
Life itself is “scary” for it involves DEATH, and in this regard I can still remember asking my mother when I was about five what happens to you when you die. And she said that:
“When you’re dead, you’re dead, and you Ain’t no more.”
Needless to say, her words were not very comforting.
And because I Love my daughter I want her to know God personally, on occasion, I talk to her about God. That is part of parenting. And in that regard high conflict parent with money knew what I believed about God before we were married: for we attended the SAME Bible Studies and Church Services together both BEFORE and DURING our marriage.
Even IF I were to disobey the Lord to obey the order that Mr. Benjamin wrote up, he and his client would still NOT BE SATISFIED. See below for more details.
Mr. Berg: “Your honor, I have had the same job for 25 years now… I don’t have problems with my co-workers. I get along with… my roommate… If you don’t want me to talk about God, I won’t talk to her about God.”
9-27-06; P. 18:17-25.
Judge Hendrix: “Would that solve the problem?” P. 18:26.
Billy: “No. This is a pattern of behavior… It is not a single incident. This… individual… blows up… at the child, and…scared the child.” P. 18:27-19:6.
Billy’s response is typical of someone who is either on mind-altering drugs, or afflicted with Selective Mutism, False Disorder Syndrome, and/or Transcript Alteritis: or someone who thinks they OWN the Family Courts???
Mr. Benjamin is a pathological liar who uses grossly distorted events and lies to commit (LEGALIZED) kidnapping in broad daylight. If anything Mr. Benjamin should be Supervised, or put in Jail: for he commits Perjury on a regular basis, and has NO FEAR of (nor respect for) the court, nor of the consequences of his actions and the damage that he is doing to broken up families.
Monica Konia has observed me with my daughter for the past 1.5 YEARS. She can see what is going on, even as my current and former roommates. And they know that I do not “blow up” at my daughter; however we do play all sorts of games together. And before I had to PAY MONEY to see Rayna, I would to take her to the Zoo, and Sea World and Wild Animal Park. I also used to take her swimming and bike riding. And on occasion I talk to her about God. That is what Parenting is about.
But since Mr. Benjamin does seem to think that the court can take God’s Place, and since the court also thinks that it can just push God aside, then I have some questions that I would like the court to address, and they are as follows:
Can any of its officials raise the dead?
Can they create an amoeba ... ?
Are they going to teach children about the One who made them?
If so, when are they going to start, and what are they going to teach: that we evolved from slime by a never before seen stroke of luck, that goes against the laws of nature? And IF this be so, when are they going to replicate any of the most basic self-replicating organisms in their laboratories? And IF they ever do so, are they going to tinker around with the DNA, and manufacture thousands of proteins that nature can’t make, or are they going to let nature just “do its thing” – like the die-hard believers in evolutionary theory tell us it can do?
Or are they going to teach them NOTHING under the guise of what is falsely called science and tell them there is NOTHING Special about them: that they are simply the products of Time and Chance?
It is not Mr. Benjamin’s, or the court’s place to tell parents they can’t take their kids to church or teach them about God.
Mr. Benjamin also stated that this was not “a single incident,” and in that he is correct: for there have been FIVE incidents that his client has falsely accused me of: two of which were Largely his fault.
It is however true that when high conflict parent with money would tell LIES (or “misstate the facts”) in the presence of Miss Ospeck that I would get upset. However, even when she was caught in the act of doing so, Miss Ospeck did NOTHING: including report what she discovered to the court.
More Lies by Mr. Benjamin: “…We think in the long term this child needs a meaningful relationship with her Father. It’s not going to be possible so long as Mr. Berg is never wrong ...” 9-27-06; P.4:8-12
What Billy meant was that it’s not going to be possible as long as Billy is NEVER wrong, and as long as he is running the show at the Family Friendly (IF you have Money) Court.
For even though I MOVED to another house, to try and please the Queen mother, I forgot that she is like a Sink-Hole of never-ending wants and demands. So quite naturally she and Billy were not satisfied: which is why they kept on telling Lies and seeking Sole Legal Custody of Rayna, by any and all means at their disposal: including to place my daughter and the Court between me and my faith in God, and that this is wrong: even as it is wrong for the court’s officials to USE Rayna to fill their pockets and Bank Accounts with CASH.
That’s also why I call her the Queen mother, and her attorney: Billy-the-Kidnapper.
The reason given for Bowing Down to Billy is also telling. For Billy got the Court to Hold my daughter RANSOM because I read her a 10 minute story from her Children’s Bible rather than take her to church. Billy’s request was also against the advice of both minor’s counsel and Rayna’s play therapist, Miss McCutchan: a woman who once told me what I already knew: i.e. that Rayna is fine, and “doesn’t need to see” her anymore: but the Queen mother would have none of it and has still been taking her to this day.
The Courthouse Kidnapping took place at our Dec. 6, 2006 hearing.
For at that hearing I asked Judge Hendrix why he was ordering me to be Supervised, and he said: “Let’s make it clear. It’s not Mr. Benjamin causing this…” and “All right. The one explanation I told you not to, shall we say, Sunday school your child.” See 12-06-06; pp. 19:6-17. Emphasis Added.
How Billy accomplished this is as follows:
At our Sept. 27, 2006 hearing Mr. Lesh was silent on my being able to talk to my daughter about God: at least according to the transcript. So Billy got the court to tell me to make “no such comments” to my daughter, and that I would: “not to be the religious teacher of” my daughter, but to “keep (my) beliefs to (my) self.” 9-27-06; P. 16:5-8, and 16:25-26.
When discussing this with Mr. Lesh at our January 16th, 2007 hearing he admitted that Christians and Jews are commanded to “bring up children in the knowledge of the Lord.” In other words, Bob knows that Billy and the court crossed the line. For when the state comes between a Christian and his relationship with God, he is supposed to stand up for his faith and tell the state to back off. This is also why our Lord said to: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s.” Matt. 22:21.
Bill Benjamin has exalted the court to God’s throne, and is trying to get me to worship it and its officials as if they were God: Something I REFUSE to do.
I was perfectly content to leave my orthodox Christian beliefs out of Court, and even went out of my way to alert Mr. Lesh what high conflict parent with money was up to and in that process I provided him with various numbers he could call if he wanted more information. I also gave Mr. Lesh the address to my web site. But either Bob didn’t care, or he took it personal that I have an article on my web site that speaks against infant baptism? Or Billy handed him a $5 Bill???
And even though I made no more “such comments” to Rayna about the Lord’s coming, Billy and Ms. B. didn’t care: for what they Really wanted was Sole Legal Custody, and they were willing to do anything to get it: including bring my Bible-based beliefs into the courtroom. And since the court’s officials failed to tell the court that I have been going to church for over 28 years, and that I gave my life to Jesus when I was 20 years old, and stopped smoking dope and getting drunk and looking at Porn, and also failed to inform the court that high conflict parent with money is a pathological liar, they got the court to commit a grievous act in the eyes of the Lord by taking a girls father away from her over “minutia,” and “minor parenting issues.”
At our Dec. 6th hearing the Judge said: “You don’t have to go to a Psychiatrist.” But Billy forgot to put it in the order. See 12-06-06; P. 10 Line 28 -- P. 11:1.
Billy has since tried to Hand-Pick the Court-Buddy as well. This is discussed in more detail in the upcoming section on Bob Lesh and in another Declaration that I am filing at this time. These things suggest that Mr. Benjamin needs to be evaluated to see if medication might possibly help, as does his high conflict client with money.
How I lost Respect for Private Mediation
Because of a lack of accountability, Private Mediators can do the SAME THING over and over again, as if they think it might possibly bring a different result: i.e. what Franklin and Einstein called insanity.
However, in the case of Private Mediation, I do not think that the mediators are actually insane, but rather that they WANT the SAME result. For every time they get to see their little kiddy parents they get another little ($150-250) Jackpot. In fact, Dr. Fox even told me that it was “not (his) job” to admonish the Queen.
Because of these things I have written a paper called “Reforming the Family Courts” that I am also filing at this time.
And if you walk out on a mediator, he or she will go BERSERK.
For example, Miss Ospeck “forgot” almost everything that she discovered in two years of mediation about our case: and also to inform the court that she caught the high conflict parent with money telling a BIG ONE when she asserted that Rayna was “afraid of” her dad during one of our (not so) friendly get-togethers. That was also why Miss Ospeck came to my house: to observe me with my daughter and talk to my roommates. And in like manner, Bob Lesh has refused to call Miss Ospeck to ask her about it, or to ask that she respond to my letters.
Consider also the way that Billy the Kidnapper and his minor's counsel buddy (Bob Lesh) got high conflict parent with money and I back into the Private Mediation Money SCAM. For at the exact same time that Mr. Lesh was telling the court that high conflict parent with money and I had “communication problems,” Billy was telling his client NOT to make a 2-minute phone call to communicate with me about the suitcase incident, and to ask what happened. Perhaps that’s why Bobby later admitted that the “couples therapy” that he and Billy asked for was “not really” necessary? See the upcoming section on Bob Lesh.
High conflict parent with money was not happy that Rayna still got to see her dad on a regular basis, and since private mediation provided more opportunities to HARASS him, then THAT was what she wanted. So after 22 (or more) sessions with Miss Ospeck I walked out, and the Queen told Billy to get her some more no matter what it took. So Billy and Bobby came up with a plan. They would claim that high conflict parent with money and I could not communicate in any language known to man, and that the Fox could Fix what Miss Ospeck couldn’t.
Dr. Fox even informed me that my new wife “should be happy” that I was still in “Couple’s Therapy” with my old wife. He also made certain that we always knew when our NEXT APPOINTMENT would be.
The Lies of Miss Ospeck:
Before I walked out on Miss Ospeck she told the truth; however she did not tell high conflict parent with money to stop telling Lies even though she caught her in the act.
After I walked out on Miss Ospeck she literally went berserk. And about a week later – in her second report (dated 10-19-05) – she said that I “slammed” her door as I walked out. I didn’t find out until a week later, when I read it in her report.
Miss Ospeck also said that I may have “traumatized” Rayna when I told her that I didn’t put my finger up her butt as high conflict parent with money had claimed (in her 3rd false charge). But then came some bad news for Miss Ospeck. For less than a week after her report was broadcasted Rayna’s play therapist – who actually spent time with Rayna on a regular basis – suddenly informed me that Rayna was fine and didn’t need to see her anymore.
And boy was I relieved to find that out. And less than a week after I suggested to Miss Ospeck that she make a habit of speaking with the other therapists involved BEFORE telling stories, she had relocated her office to be rightnextdoortoMissMcCutchan’s.
Mr. Lesh also agreed that Rayna is “… a wonderful young girl, quite charming, open and friendly. She had no problem in talking to me; she did not seem uncomfortable or ill at ease when showing me around the house or showing me all of her toys, etc ... She was very talkative, and in general a quite enjoyable little girl.” 3-15-06; P. 4:6-11
The fact is that Miss Ospeck was not happy that I didn’t want to keep playing GAMES with the “most nitpicky client” she ever had: who habitually told Lies, and whom she had caught telling a BIG ONE: when she said, “Rayna is afraid of her dad.”
Miss Ospeck also didn’t have to answer any questions at the 2-09-06 hearing. And when I asked her one, she remained silent, and I was told to not to upset the twin-engine golden tugboat.
And so my attorney told me that Mr. Lesh would do his best to “straighten out” the mess that Miss Ospeck had made (of herself and the facts). But rather than fix anything, Bobby do-gooder made an even BIGGER MESS, by putting a Fox on the case. And soon I found out that he was indeed a Fox: who wanted to run up my Credit Cards. So rather than fix anything, Bobby and Billy sought to give Miss Ospeck and Dr. (Sly) Fox one last chance to trash me behind closed doors.
I have attempted to straighten out the Mess by sending Miss Ospeck “numerous” letters; but she has remained mum. Perhaps she suspects that there might not be any more MONEY in it for her?
How I Lost Respect for Bob Lesh:
Bob Lesh was appointed to this case because Miss Ospeck refused to make a phone call to discover what was going on at the house where I used to live. And after I walked out on Miss Ospeck: who went BERSERK at the perceived “injustice” of my standing up for my daughter, and myself: after watching her do absolutely Nothing on my behalf: either to get high conflict parent with money to grow up, or to expose her to the court.
Bob Lesh was ostensibly appointed to write a report about my living situation; however, shortly after being appointed he switched gears and sought to force me to bow down to Billy-the-Kid: for example by asserted that the high conflict parent with money and I could not communicate.
According to Bob: Miss McCutchan, my daughter’s play therapist informed him that high conflict parent with money and I could not communicate.
This was the same Miss McCutchan who had NEVER seen the high conflict parent with money and I together.
So the question that needs to be asked is: How could Miss McCutchan come to the conclusion that high conflict parent with money and I were in desperate need of “couple’s therapy”?
The only thing that makes sense is that Miss McCutchan was aware that the high conflict parent with money had not bothered to call me to ask about the suitcase incident, BEFORE she Falsely Accused me of child abuse for the 4th time, or that Miss McCutchan was aware that Miss Ospeck might possibly get spanked for falsely accusing me of “traumatizing” Rayna: just one week before she, herself, informed me that Rayna was fine: but this would mean that she was taking her orders through the Peep Hole between their offices (???), and none of us have proof that it even exists.
It’s also possible that Billy handed Bob a $5 when nobody was watching and told him how frustrated the Queen mother was at not being able to make up stories about her X anymore. In this regard it should also be mentioned that high conflict parent with money was seeing a “therapist” when we met, and had been for years.
I have been a Christian for over 29 years. Trusting Jesus as my Lord was the Best Thing that has ever happened to me. Although I am not perfect, I have no crime or driving record, and I Love my daughter, but after three years of living with the Queen, we realized that we didn’t Love each other. And ever since she’s been telling fibs both in, and out of, court: while the court’s officials have USED her to make about $120,000 in about five years: Just for listening to the Queen’s endless stream of complaints, and not able to see that she Hates me for not giving her another child, and because I didn’t want to become a TV addict.
The following indiscretions by Mr. Lesh suggest that he needs some form of accountability, or truth syrup meds? Perhaps Both?
You have to tell Billy: Bob Lesh told me that I had to notify Mr. Benjamin before ordering a transcript. Two other lawyers told me otherwise. Why Mr. Lesh would tell me that only he knows? Perhaps because he knew that several of them were altered?
Billy gets to Choose: Bob Lesh said that: “If his client is paying for it then Mr. Benjamin gets to choose.” If that were the case then why have three Choices?
And when two of Billy’s Selections were unable to come out to Play, I knew I had been SET UP like a RAT. Bobby has since refused to put in writing what he told me on the phone shortly after our January (2007) hearing: i.e. that Billy gets to choose.
Numerous Instances: Bob Lesh Lied to the court when he said there were “numerous instances” of my not giving Rayna her medication when she was ill. Dr. Fox had an opportunity to straighten this out but when he found out that neither Ospeck nor Lesh knew what they were talking about he promptly changed the subject: since the Queen mother fell silent when she was asked to elaborate in Dr. Fox’s office.
Bob said that Dr. Fox Said: Bob Lesh asserted that I “stormed out” of Dr. Fox’s office at our Sept. 27th 2006 hearing. P. 7:1-3.
If so then Dr. Fox “stormed out” behind me, since he followed me down the hall as I walked out. Even IF I did “storm out” so what? I was OUT OF MONEY, and the Fox didn’t care, but wanted to RUN UP my Credit Cards.
So either Bob is fibbing, or Dr. Fox is fibbing??? And since they are both prone to tell fibs it is difficult to tell who the fibber is in this instance.
Dr. Fox also refused to sign for a letter I sent him in that regard: dated Feb. 17, 2008.
I Beat up my Kid: Bob Lesh asserted that I “buffeted” my daughter at our Sept. 27th 2006 hearing (P. 14:2). Where Bob came up with this only he knows; however, it DOES FIT with what he told me after we walked out of court on Sept. 27, 2006: i.e. that he asked for an evaluation “because you put your daughter in a suitcase.”
After Mr. Lesh said this I again explained to him what happened about a year before, and which was previously explained in a Declaration that I filed on July 7th of 2006.
Bob’s response went hand in hand with what he had said only moments before in court: that I had “buffeted” my daughter around the house: p. 14:2.
Mr. Lesh has since denied that the suitcase incident had anything to do with what he requested at the Sept. 27, 2006 hearing: for in a Declaration dated Jan. 10th 2007 (P.2:1-9), Mr. Lesh said that: “I also specifically recall that I did not tell the Petitioner that I asked for that because he put his daughter in a suitcase”; however THAT WAS the FIRST thing Mr. Lesh said to me when I asked him why he asked for an evaluation by a psychiatrist, when we walked out of the courtroom. And in a letter dated 7-30-07, Mr. Lesh back-tracked, saying that it “may have been one of the minor reasons…” P.1, Paragraph four.
Also in Mr. Lesh’s Jan. 10, 2007 letter, was the assertion that I had a “significant problem with stability” (P.2:14-16). If Mr. Lesh is talking about my ability to continue paying Double and Triple Child support he is correct. If something else, perhaps he should explain what he meant so that we can obtain a better understanding of how he thinks?
Calling God a Liar: Bob Lesh and Bill Benjamin are calling God a Liar: for the Scriptures say that those who know Him have a “sound mind”: II Tim. 1:7.
Nothing but a Pack-O-Lies: At our Sept. 27th 2006 hearing I again informed the court of high conflict parent with money’s propensity to tell lies and falsely accuse me. For at that hearing I said that:
High conflict parent with money ... "has already falsely accused me of child abuse four times, and it was investigated and yet nobody is looking at her with a microscope.” 9-27-06; P. 20:9-11.
Mr. Lesh responded as follows: “In conjunction with the order for the psychiatrist, I think it would be appropriate for Mr. Berg to execute releases so that the psychiatrist may talk with each of the therapists involved.” 9-27-06: P. 20:12-16.
Mr. Lesh’s response suggests that he has either “Selective Mutism” or “False Disorder Syndrome”? Also because Transcripts have been altered, someone associated with this case also has Transcript Alteritis.
Because of Mr. Lesh’s response I again tried to get the court’s attention, and so for our Jan. 16, 2007 hearing I filed a paper called: “Nine Lies that Respondent has told to the Court and it’s Officials,”: where I document Nine of high conflict parent with money’s Lies, but still no response. I have since written Mr. Lesh on at least five other occasions, but he refuses to make even a phone all to investigate what has happened, or to acknowledge my frustration and displeasure with Private Mediation after participating in over 30 sessions, but willing to take a girls father away from her over Lies, “minutia,” and “minor parenting issues.”
More False Statements by Mr. Lesh:
Mr. Lesh: “…To prepare for the hearing I have been in communication with … Dr. Robinson…” 9-27-06; P.6:11-14
That statement was also not true. I know because Dr. Robinson was my “Therapist” for 8-9 months, and he told me that he didn’t think I needed to be on mind-altering drugs when he heard what Benjamin and Lesh were up to. And when I informed Mr. Lesh of Dr. Robinson’s position he admitted to me that he had not bothered to talk to Dr. Robinson before the hearing to ask his opinion.
Bob Continues: And so “I would join in Mr. Benjamin’s request… to see if some form of medication might help Mr. Berg …” Bob Lesh; 9-27-06; P. 7:5-16.
Note also that Bob and Billy’s request is not just based on hearsay: for they both have degrees in psychology... but… they forgot them at home.
Then comes the Big Question that exposes what Billy and Bobby were up to: i.e. using kids to play Games with (OTHER) people’s MONEY and Credit Cards.
Judge Hendrix: “Is there a need for this couple’s therapy?” 9-27-06; P. 12:26-27
Bob Lesh: “Not really.” 9-27-06; P. 12:28
This is the same Bob Lesh who asked for “couple’s therapy” just a few months before: Apr. 4, 2006, P. 2:10-15. The same Bob Lesh who told the Judge how hard the “therapists” were working to “open lines of communication.” 9-27-06; P. 13:1-4
The same Bob Lesh who didn’t care if Rayna EVER SAW HER DAD AGAIN when it was pointed out to him in a letter (dated March 29th 2007) that Rayna was not doing well not seeing her dad.
The same Bob Lesh who is willing to Sacrifice a girl’s future over “minor parenting issues” to make a few more bucks or to coerce her dad to worship people who are not God.
The same Bob Lesh whose ONLY concern when I began seeing Rayna again, was that “I could AFFORD to” PAY MONEY “to see her” and that I “was not going to be dropping in and out of her life.” He also made that crystal clear in a letter that he sent to Monika Konia at that time: making sure that she was being Paid.
The same Bob Lesh who is a leader in a church that I have spoken out against.
Bob the Preacher: I also have reason to believe that Bob Lesh is Biased against me because of things on my web site that are opposed to the teachings of his church. Things that were there BEFORE he ever came on this case.
For Mr. Lesh stood by while Billy got the court to allow my beliefs to come into the courtroom. And since Mr. Lesh is a Leader in his Lutheran Church, and has Men’s Bible Studies in his home, and because I made him aware of my web site when I found out that the high conflict parent with money was bringing my beliefs in the courtroom, there is a conflict of interest in keeping Mr. Lesh on this case: and especially since my Christian beliefs have been allowed to come into the C.C.C. *
Mr. Lesh has also ignored almost everything that Monika Konia, has said in her reports, and instead has focused ONLY on a comment I made about people in the system who don’t care about kids and who treat them like property.
Bob Lesh and the One-Size-Fits-All Private Mediation / Money Scam:
Mr. Lesh: “Mr. Berg’s concern… was more financial than anything else… and …Dr. Fox said he can meet with him” and the Queen Mother once “every three weeks” instead of every one or two… Bob Lesh; 9-27-06; P. 14:7-10. Slightly Modified for Clarity
Comment: I informed Dr. Fox at least five times that, after spending over $45,000 on legal and other court related fees that I was out of MONEY and that Miss Ospeck only had us meet once a month. He had us meeting almost every week for several months.
Bob Lesh also has a communication problem: for he can’t figure out how to ask Miss Ospeck a question, such as: “How come you didn’t inform the court that you caught the Queen mother telling a BIG ONE?”
Nor can Mr. Lesh seem to figure out how to dial Miss Ospeck’s number, to ask why she didn’t speak with Miss McCutchan BEFORE writing her report: for if she had she might not have falsely accused me of “traumatizing” Rayna six months after the false charges were thrown at me (???).
And after three weeks of not seeing Rayna Mr. Lesh received a letter from Mr. Benjamin asking him to “contact the child’s therapist …to inquire into the impact of the child not seeing Mr. Berg… and that Ms. (high conflict parent with money) wishes to make certain that you are made aware of the potential impact upon the minor child,” but Mr. Lesh did NOTHING. See March 29, 2007 letter from Mr. Benjamin’s office to Robert W. Lesh. And when I started seeing Rayna again (once every 2-wks) all Mr. Lesh cared about was that I would not be dropping in and out of her life, and that I could afford to keep PAYING to see her.
Bob Lesh did recognize that we are dealing with “minor parenting issues…” (4-04-2006, P. 5:19) and that: “having spent time with the minor child in the presence of both parents, … it does appear that the mother… may be overly protective as the observation of the father’s interactions with Rayna, … did not lead minor’s counsel to believe that the child at risk or in danger in any way.” 3-15-06; P. 6:15-23
And ever since Mr. Lesh has been OBSESSED with offering Dr. Fox and Miss Ospeck one last chance to trash me behind closed doors.
If this were not the case then Mr. Lesh would have made a phone call to Miss Ospeck to ask her why she came to my house to observe me with my daughter.
Since Mr. Lesh has come on this case, the time I have spent with Rayna has went from 2-3 times a week for 4-8 hours at a time, and one overnight visit a month, to one visit every two weeks for 3-hours: at my expense.
For these reasons I believe high conflict parent with money, Mr. Benjamin, and Mr. Lesh should all be evaluated by a psychiatrist to see if they have mental problems, and if so whether medication might possibly help them with their fib telling (???). If not then I think it is time to remove Mr. Lesh from this case and to order high conflict parent with money to Reimburse me for all of the Supervision Fees I have paid over the past year and a half, and for ½ of my Life Insurance Premiums. For high conflict parent with money is supposed to have a $300,000 Life Insurance policy; however, she is refusing to allow anyone to see it.
Mr. Benjamin should be admonished in some way for fibbing to the court on numerous occasions, and for saying (on an Ex Parte form) that notification was “not timely” when in fact it was not even given. Mr. Benjamin should also be admonished for making a false charge of child abuse that wasn’t even investigated: perhaps a light tap on the hand?
I also think that Bob Lesh should be removed from this case for allowing Dr. Fox to get out of the report that he was supposed to write, and that Dr. Fox and Miss Ospeck should be removed from this case for refusing to answer questions, or else brought in at high conflict parent with money’s, expense to answer them under oath.
And if the court doesn’t care about truth and justice, or about the lives of children, or can’t see that I Love my daughter and that she Loves Me, or that I am a responsible father, then my daughter will soon be without her Dad: for I cannot continue to PAY Double and Triple Child Support, nor am I about to Bow Down and worship this Church Court just to make people with malicious and/or sadistic egos feel good about not doing their jobs.
I declare that fibbery is a means whereby the San Diego, CA, Family Courts rake in Lots-O-Loot: and that Ms. B., Miss Ospeck, Dr. R.J. Sly-Fox, Robert W. Lesh, and William M. Benjamin (a.k.a. Billy the Kidnapper) are Fibbers, and that the foregoing is true and correct.
Randy S. Berg
Filed with the San Diego Family Court on May 27, 2008: slightly modified for publication in 2010
* C.C.C. = Church-Court’s Chambers
How to Hand-Pick a Court-Buddy who will do what you want
Family Court Central