The Fact is that we exist;
this is True because the world exists and we exist and every day we wake up
the same person -- only one day older. Therefore to honestly seek
the truth of how we got here is to search
for our Creator: either God or nature. It is not just about "Religion," but about
truth, and "science" is supposed to aid us in that search, and
not dictate what the truth is before it can be proven to be true: or demonstrated. See Open
Letter to an Atheist and
it Science or Religion?
Was it, "In the
Beginning God," who created the heavens and the earth: and us, or
was it nothing (???) that exploded -- and over "billions of years"
slowly and against the laws of nature ... organized itself more and
more and more and more ... until it made its own proteins, wrote its own DNA
code ... and then came to life? The details aren't really important, but
scientists tell us that they know (the story) best: and how it was that life
supposedly got (itself) going ... ???
(as opposed to mother nature)
Actually did Create the Heavens and the
Including Me and You, and Every Life-form Therein?
As we are told in Genesis 1:1 and
Many other Scriptures.
And What If the Mass Media has been
(and still is)
What is the Mass Media
What is their Agenda?
Is it not to:
Cover up the Facts,
and Hope that Nobody
Is the Mass Media Interested in reporting the Truth
in a fair and balanced manner without
it to fit what they want us to believe?
For example, they STILL promote
Your Great, Great, 1000th Great Grandfather
was a Jellyfish ... that ...
(over millions and millions of years) ...
might have (just) evolved from ...
say, an Amoeba ...
that resulted from a lightning bolt ...
that struck a primordial slime-pool ...
with just the right mixture of chemicals ...
In other words: The Theory of Evolution
is based on nothing more than Faith... in what
Scientists WANT to be True about how they think
life might possibly have arrived on Planet Earth
and is actually MUCH Less Scientific
that we were Created by a Creator.
In reality the Theory
of Evolution Does not
Stand up to Scientific scrutiny.
Which is why it belongs in
a Book of Esoteric Religions,
But rather than have
Public discourse on the Evidence
the so-called seekers of truth
Don't want the Debate
to take place, nor to give God
their own existence,
much less to serve Him with their
Many people are not thankful,
that God Made Them.
who own the Media,
and those who work for them
began to Question what they were told
and to acknowledge the many Scientists
who believe in a Creator,
and to report on the Scientific and Logical
that Support the concept of Creation?
For example, Media reporters, writers and producers
routinely call what evolution propagandists
Believe in and
label as "science,"
while at the same time, Ignoring,
Editing out almost everything Creation Scientists
Have to Say --
(that is, if they even bother
to ask their opinions)
while labeling them and the Facts of Science
(that evolutionist story telling can
it is only because of the mass media's hypocrisy,
ignorance, lack of courage, and/or HATRED of God and Jesus,
that evolution is still taught at all -- in ANY public institution.
In fact, their ignorance
of the facts is so Bad,
that one has to wonder when they are finally going to
and realize that they were Hoodwinked by the
Who for years have GREATLY overstated
the supposed evidences for evolution
while Ignoring and/or censoring the
that tells us there MUST be a Creator.
For example, what if it could be proven that Life as we know
it is FAR TOO
COMPLEX to have started
itself via any natural process known to
And why is
Media and "scientific"
it be that they really don't want the Entire Public to
plainly see that they have been lying to us for years,
and that their king no longer has any clothes?
What if the miracle of
into the DNA
of each male and female Moth and Butterfly
every species --
from the beginning of
Wouldn't this mean that the "millions of years"
slow evolution is wrong?
are those who
stand up for the truth labeled as
"religious" or "Fundamentalist"
(i.e. possessing basic common sense)
by the Mass Media?
Why is their AGENDA more important than the
is the media spineless when it comes to reporting
of this Very Important
a Fair and Unbiased manner?
What are they Afraid of ?
it be that they Hate the possibility that
they might be wrong, or
Or do they
deceiving our kids, and promoting
unrestricted killing of innocent children, and violence
guns and bombs)
in Games and TV and Movies more than the truth ?
For those who want to know more See:
Science to Eliminate the Creator
Search on: "Evolution
+ Impossible" = 17,900,000 Web Pages
reporting on this = Zilch / Zip / Null / Nada
You Being Brainwashed By Your Public School Science Textbooks?
Media Bias Continues
In a nutshell
The Agenda of the
is as follows:
Radiometric Dating Cover-Up
Young Earth Evidences Cover-Up
Trafficking Services Cover-Up
in the Public Schools Cover-Up
Accounts of Dinosaurs Cover-Up
Are Dinosaurs Millions of Years Old
the Founders Taught and Believed Cover-Up
Values, and Alternative News Sources
Here's another Example
of how the Mass Media
regularly twists the truth to fit their Agenda
Is Anybody Home?
may Not be
"Billions of Years" Old:
All because of a few
PROBLEMS with Radiometric Dating
What if Carbon 14
over 5,000 years old are unreliable?
Or would they say that such
Dates and Dating Techniques are
when used to "date" Coal Seams, Diamonds, and Unfossilized
valid when "dating" Neanderthals, Mammoths,
or Saber-tooth Tigers?
See also this article on Carbon
Dating of Dinosaur Bones
Dating has been exposed as a "pseudoscience"
that is not (at all) reliable, objective, or "proven" to be accurate?
What if a 220 million year "date" for a Human-like skull was rejected
simply because it didn't
"fit" well with evolutionary speculations?
What if the younger date that was accepted, and then cross-checked by various
(purportedly "scientific") dating methods, was itself
-- simply because it
also didn't fit well enough with
is running the show?
science ever prevail against the highly
"science" of evolution?
the truth will come out,
and those who promoted it will either be
laughed out of our Universities, and/or
for their ignorance, Lies,
and Cowardice .... simply because
the Truth always (eventually) Prevails.
The case of The
KBS Tuff ?" /
Radiometric Dating Exposed
"Radiometric Dating Involves at least
Eight Untestable Assumptions"
To find it, Click
Here and scroll down
Problems with the Geological Time Chart
What if “mainstream”
geologists took a wrong turn 180 (or so) years ago with
regard to their interpretation of the Worldwide physical evidences
for a World
Wide Flood and the Age of the Earth (and thereafter assumed they were on the
What if at various locations around the
world (either in
or near coal seams) many
thousands of trees have been found that are buried
either upright, oblique
with regard to the surrounding strata -- quite often -- with their
this little known fact ignored, or minimized by secular (old earth) geologists?
Why is the one
fossil tree with roots and rootlets
(that is very
questionably "rooted" in place of growth) more
important to evolutionists than
other 49 that
are missing most (if not all) of
their roots and rootlets?
Wouldn't this also mean that (most
likely) NONE of these trees grew in the
places where they are now buried, and that the entire Geological Time Chart
(with all of its Time Periods)
has nothing at all to do with long periods
of time, but rather is
simply evidence for different stages of a Single
Why is the popular theory of coal formation,
still taught as if it were
a fact, central to how the earth came to be thought of as "Billions of Years" old?
What if coal
seams could be (and have been) dated by Carbon
that all coals (no matter how
far below the surface) "date" to less than
50,000 years old?
What if there is strong physical evidence that a
took place in the not-too-distant past?
What if hundreds of civilizations had very similar "Legends"
And then there is the Problem
of Out of Order Fossils:
a problem that...
doesn't seem to be
See Also: Human
Remains All Throughout the Geologic Column
Dragons of Old and Dinosaurs of New:
Might they be Just
One in the Same?
What if many thousands of Unfossilized
Dinosaur Bones were
found in sandy soil in
What if organic
material is preserved in fossil wood that
is (supposed to be)
300,000,000 years old?
What if bacteria were
preserved alive for Millions of Years?
What if a Dinosaur
Bone from Montana
possessed organic molecules
(such as collagen, fragmented
DNA and proteins)
and even little round
things that looked "just like" red blood
if these bones were not encased in amber, but rather in porous
What if "Scientists" are lying when they say they "know" that
Dinosaur bones are mythions of years old
as opposed to admitting
that they merely believe they are...
based on their
faith in the
and Mathematically Impossible
Rumor also has it
that some Dinosaur Eggs from China
are so fresh that they smell like
What if two different Dinosaurs
are clearly described
Testament Book of Job -- Chapters 40-41?
One of which had a
tail like a "cedar tree," ate grass like
an ox, and had leg bones that were like "bars of iron"?
If dinosaurs and
existed at the same time
wouldn't this mean
that the Geological Time
Chart -- along with its "mythions of years"
of evolution -- is
almost certainly wrong?
What if many thousands of
Stones and pottery
pieces from around the world portrayed
What if a
800-1000-year-old (unrestored) Temple in Cambodia has
carving of a Stegosaurus next
to various other carvings of animals?
What are the
is this evidence for a recent extinction of the Dinosaurs virtually
by the Mass Media and popular "science" publications?
Could it be
that they want evolution taught in all public
even though the public overwhelmingly
believes in a Creator
with how this subject is (still to
this day) being force-fed to our
And even though
it can be
that there must be a Creator?
are the beliefs of the half (of Scientists) who believe in evolution so much
more important than the
beliefs of the
other half, or of the average person?
And why (pray tell) are the beliefs of the (other) 50% of Scientist's
who DON'T Believe
in evolution virtually ignored by the American Media?
it be that the mass media is more responsible for this
it be that the way the media "reports" on this, or by the
choose NOT to report on, has had a detrimental effect, not only on the perception
of the public at large, but also on our
courts and children, -- who are still being
taught in public schools that God doesn't
What if many different ancient
civilizations from around the world have
of large creatures
that resemble dinosaurs?
What about the "legend" of
Was he an actual person of history,
or a made-up character? See
and the Bible.
What if a living dinosaur was found in the
What are the chances
of such taking place?
12 animals that make up the Chinese New
Do any of them have anything to do with
Miller's Letter to the Editor
Birds Evolve From Dinosaurs?
Sized Mammal found in Dinosaur
School Expedition uncovers a
with unfossilized wood mixed in with the bones
found in Jurassic (Dino) Strata
For many more articles on Dinosaurs and Man
Living together see:
Evidence that Humans and
Dinosaurs Lived Together at the same Time
Dark Matter and The Big
What if the Continental Drift
verified by direct
but by the assumed accuracy and reliability of Potassium-Argon
What if North America and Europe
were (supposedly) divided in
200,000,000 years while South America and Africa in
1/10th that time
and are now moving in the wrong direction?
What if the actual drift rate of the
San Andreas Fault tells us it is
less than 5,000
and the Public Schools:
What We Believe
What if only
10% of the American
Public agrees with evolutionary theory as it is
in our Public Schools -- And that the Scientific Evidences for
(and/or against evolution) should also be taught in Public
Would CBS or NBC or ABC or Even
News Report it?
And the Answer?
of Church and State:
What the Mass Media Doesn't want you to know:
What if any honest Third Grader
who has a copy of this little First-Grade
(and actually reads it) would have to conclude that "Separation
of Church and State"
as it is now taught (rather spun) to the Public, is
NOT what our Founding Fathers
had in mind when they wrote the
Constitution. To find out more simply...
Did you know that the words
"separation," "Church," or "State"
even appear in the Constitution?
Did you also know that only a
little over 100 years ago the U.S. Supreme Court
said that the United States of
America was "a
Christian Nation" and that Prayers
to God at all sorts of Public
meetings and civic groups were common practice
Or that 1947
was the first year that the Supreme Court issued a
in favor of forcing the states to comply with their
re-interpretation of the First Amendment
(which was directed at Congress)
mention of the words
"separation of church and state"
(that appear in a letter to the
out of their original context?
In other words, what
CONGRESS couldn't (and wouldn't) do by law, nine Supreme
did by re-interpreting the Constitution and applying to the states things
their predecessors never saw, and claimed for themselves powers that their
predecessors never dared
In other words, they
and usurped the rights of ALL 50 States,
in doing so and legislated from the bench with the stroke of a pen.
This, of course, should not mean
that a State should be allowed to Force Christianity,
or any other religion,
down the throats of its constituents, for that goes
the teachings of Christianity itself -- which allows people to reject their Creator
and His rightful authority over their lives, while warning them of
consequences (that God has said such actions will bring). But today it
has been so
reversed, that Christians are told that they can't even mention the
word "God" in a
public classroom -- even if their school assignment is
to write a report about how they
think we got here, and then asked (by the
teacher) to read it in front of their class.
the Old and New Testaments Trustworthy?
What if the Old
Testaments were by far
well-documented writings of
And why do many people reject the Bible -- along with it's teachings
Warnings!!! -- without ever
taking the time to read it for themselves,
(for themselves) whether or not it is true?
Why do many people not
want to believe
it be because
they Don't want to give control of their lives to anyone -- not even their own Creator
even though He, Himself,
went to great lengths to give us the opportunity to
receive His greatest gift: eternal life.
See John 3:16-21.
Does this mean that God will FORCE His "offer" of eternal
on an unwilling (or unthankful) person? If you think so then...
you don't know Him very well.
Life, Love and the
Mysteries of Creation
To find Peace with God via Personal Relationship
See our Spiritual
Health and Fitness Page
How Could God possibly
anyone, while at the same time be Loving?
Will God Reject me if I Insist on Ignoring
and Rejecting Him, and His
Son, my Whole Lifelong?
Will God Force me to be under His Authority, if I say "No thanks God,
I'm NOT interested" during my Life on Earth?
my Creator hold me accountable for my words and actions, and willful
ignorance if I claim to not believe in
John 8:24; 14:1; 17:3; I Pet. 1:21; 2:6-10
If I deny God His Right to Rule over me and Lovingly direct me during my Life on
Earth, and do
thing, and seek
my own pleasure, day after day, month
after month, year after year, till the day I die, will God still let me into His
Him? Or will He allow me to
sneak in (to His kingdom) and
keep doing my own
The Da Vinci Code Deception
Creationist Web Sites
Web Sites Link
Age of the
and DVD Videos Link
Science's Christian Foundation
Origin Archive of Creationist Papers
the Evolution Game
Love, and the Mysteries of Creation
Politics and Alternative News
that Don't Work
How to find something Online
If you find anything on this site that you "know" or "think you
know" that is inaccurate (including minor spelling mistakes) Feel free to
email us so we can correct it. If it's something that you disagree with,
and if you can
support it with documentation and/or logic and reason, Feel free to contact us
at the links below.
Copyright, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005,
2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Randy S. Berg; No part of this page, or any pages that originate from this
site, and that are the work of the author, may be reproduced, used, or
sold for profit without the express written consent of the author. Unless
otherwise noted, all pages on this site are the work of the author or one of his
Copies of articles may be distributed (for Free) and used for educational purposes only.
page was last updated on 6-11-2013
See also www.earthage2.org