The Age of the Earth

  What is Wrong with this Picture?
   Im Steinkohlenwald,  Bölsche, Wilhelm, 1906 and later editions.

Science  Vs. Evolution

Mass Media Cover-Up

Polystrate Fossil Trees

Evidence for Noah's Flood

The Continental Drift Story

What if God
(as opposed to mother nature)
Actually did Create the Heavens and the Earth:
Including Me and You, and Every Life-form Therein? 
Genesis 1:1


And What If the Mass Media has been 
(and still is)
Covering up the Evidence for this?

Mass Media Agenda # 1:
          Play Dumb, Cover up the Facts, and Hope Nobody... Notices.

Is the Mass Media Interested in Truth?
If so, then Why don't they report it?
 
That is, in a fair and balanced manner without 
slanting  
their stories to fit what they want us to believe. 
For example, they STILL promote preposterous notions such as 
the Theory that:

 Your Great, Great, 1000th Great Grandfather 
was a Jellyfish  ... that ...
 (over millions and millions of years) ...
 might have came from ...
 or Scientifically evolved from ...
(say perhaps) an Amoeba ...
that (probably, or might have) ... 
came from a lightning bolt ...
striking a primordial slime-pool ...
with just the right mixture on chemicals ...
-- 
In other words: The Famous Theory of Evolution
is based on nothing more than Faith... in what
Scientists WANT to be True about how we got here.

It is even Less Scientific than the Theory of Creation.

And in reality the Theory of Evolution Does not
Stand up to very much Scientific Scrutiny

And in my opinion at least It belongs in
the realm of esoteric religions, 
or in a book of Fairy Tales for Adults.
--
But Rather than have any sort of 
Serious Public Debates on this Issue
the Grown Ups in the Mass Media...
Don't want the Truth 
(nor any Close Scrutiny of their Pet Theory) 
to See the Light of Day... 
Nor to give God ONE IOTA of Credit for 
their own existence, 
nor to serve Him with any of their 
Time, Talents, or $$$

In fact, Many of them are not even thankful 
 at all, nor willing to admit the obvious...
 that they themselves were Created.

What if the Mass Media took away their 
Free Pass / Bull-Horn from 
evolution-believing
  (ordinary and fallible)
  people 
(who call themselves "Scientists") 
and began to scratch their heads and question what they were 
being told to believe, 
and to treat Creation Scientists with the respect they deserve,
and then to actually report on some of the Many Scientific and 
Logical Evidences that Strongly Support the Concept of Creation?

For example, Media reporters, writers and producers routinely 
call what evolution propagandists Believe in and call "scientific," 
while at the same time, Ignoring, Censoring, and/or Editing out 
almost Everything Creation Scientists Have to Say --
(that is, if they even bother to ask their opinions) 
while labeling them and the  Facts of Science  
(that evolutionist story telling can never overcome)
as "religious nonsense."

In fact, it is only because of the mass media's hypocrisy, and/or 
ignorance of the facts, lack of courage, and/or HATRED 
of God and His Son, Jesus, and those who believe in and follow Him, 
that evolution is still taught at all -- in ANY public institution.

In fact, their lack of knowledge in this area is so Bad, 
that one has to wonder when it is they are finally going to 
Wake Up 
and realize that they have been Hoodwinked by the
"Scientific Establishment"
--
Who for years have been GREATLY overstating 
the supposed evidences for evolution 
-- 
while trying to Ignore 
the virtually Conclusive Evidence Against it:
Evidence that tells us that there MUST be a Creator.

For example, what if it could be proven that Life as we know it is FAR TOO 
COMPLEX to have started itself via  any natural process known to man?   

And  why is the Mass Media and the  "scientific" community
suppressing  the Evidence?    

Could it be that they really don't want the Entire Public to 
plainly see that they have been lying to us for years, 
and that king no longer has any clothes?   

What if the miracle of Metamorphosis was programmed into the DNA 
of each male and female Moth and Butterfly
  -- of every species --  
from the beginning of Creation?   

Wouldn't this mean that the "millions of years" scenario of slow evolution 
(that we have been told Over and Over again, as if it were a fact)
is wrong?

Why also are those who stand up for the truth labeled as "religious"
or "Fundamentalist" 
(i.e. possessing basic common sense)
by the Mass Media?  

Why is their AGENDA more important than the TRUTH? 

Why is the media spineless when it comes to reporting 
BOTH SIDES 
of this subject in a Fair and Unbiased manner?   

What are they Afraid of?  

Could it be that they really do hate God, 
and Jesus, and the idea that they will one day be
  Held Accountable  
for their willful ignorance and evil actions?  

Or do they just love deceiving our kids, and promoting immorality, 
unrestricted killing of innocent children, and violence
  (with guns and bombs)  
in Games and TV and Movies more than the truth ?

For those who want to know more See:
   
Redefining Science to Eliminate the Creator

Google Search on: "Evolution + Impossible" = 17,900,000 Web Pages

Media reporting on this  = Zilch / Zip / Null / Nada

Are You Being Brainwashed By Your Public School Science Textbooks? 

See Also:
Media Bias 
More Media Bias 
Media Bias Article 1 
Mass Media Cover-Ups 
The Agenda of the Mass Media 
In a nutshell their game is Ignore, Twist, Lie, and Repeat...
 until the masses (who will believe almost anything) are deceived.

See Also:
Radiometric Dating Cover-Up 
Young Earth Evidences Cover-Up 
Creation in the Public Schools Cover-Up 
Historical Accounts of Dinosaurs Cover-Up 
What the Founders Taught and Believed Cover-Up 

See Also:
Morals, Values, and Alternative News Sources

Here's one Example of how the Mass Media 
regularly twists the truth to fit their own Agenda

What if any Carbon 14 date over 5,000 years old is known to be  unreliable?

Would "National Pornographic" or "(Don't) Discover" report it?   

Or would they say that such Dates and Dating Techniques are only invalid 
when used to "date" Coal Seams, Diamonds, and Unfossilized Dinosaur Bones,
but valid when "dating" Neanderthals, Mammoths, or Saber-tooth Tigers?  

What if  Radiometric Dating has been exposed as a "pseudoscience" 
that is not (at all) reliable, objective, or "proven" to be accurate?  

What if a 220 million year "date" for a Human-like skull was rejected 
simply because it didn't "fit" well with evolutionary speculations?  

What if the younger date that was accepted, and then cross-checked by various
 other (purportedly "scientific") dating methods, was itself (after a 10-year controversy)
rejected -- simply because it also didn't fit well enough with  evolutionary 
Assumptions?  

Who is running the show?  

Will empirical science ever prevail against the highly speculative,  
wildly imaginative,  and subjective  "science" of evolution?  

Of course it will, 
simply because 
the Truth always (eventually) Prevails.

The case of  The KBS Tuff ?" / Radiometric Dating Exposed

See also "Radiometric Dating Involves at least Eight Untestable Assumptions"
To find it, Click Here and scroll down the page. 

What if  “mainstream” geologists took a wrong turn 180 (or so) years ago with 
regard to their interpretation of the Worldwide physical evidences for a World 
Wide Flood and the Age of the Earth (and thereafter assumed they were on the 
right road)?  

What if at various locations around the world (either in or near coal seams) many 
thousands of trees have been found that are buried either upright, oblique or prostrate
 with regard to the surrounding strata  -- quite often  -- with their roots missing? 

Why is this little known fact ignored, or minimized by secular (old earth) geologists?  

Why is the one fossil tree with roots and rootlets (that is very 
questionably "rooted" in place of growth) more important to evolutionists than 
the other 49 that are missing most (if not all) of their roots and rootlets?

Wouldn't this also mean that (most likely) NONE of these trees grew in the 
places where they are now buried, and that the entire Geological Time Chart 
(with all of its Great Time Periods) 
(very likely) has nothing at all to do with long periods of time, but rather is 
simply evidence for different stages of a Single Eustatic Event?

Why is the popular theory of coal formation, that is still taught as if it were 
a fact, central to how the earth came to be thought of as "Billions of Years" old?

What if coal seams could be (and have been) dated by Carbon 14: meaning 
that all coals (no matter how far below the surface) "date" to less than 
50,000 years old? 

What if there is strong physical evidence that a 
Worldwide Flood  
took place in the not-too-distant past?

What if hundreds of civilizations had very similar "Legends" of a Worldwide Flood?

And then there is the Problem of Out of Order Fossils: a problem that...
  doesn't seem to be going away.
See Also: Human Remains All Throughout the Geologic Column

What if many thousands of Unfossilized Dinosaur Bones were 
found in sandy soil in northern Alaska?  

What if organic material is preserved in fossil wood that 
is (supposed to be) 300,000,000 years old? 

What if bacteria were preserved alive for Millions of Years?   

What if a Dinosaur Bone from Montana possessed organic molecules 
(such as collagen, fragmented DNA and proteins)  
and even little round things that looked "just like" red blood cells? 

What if these bones were not encased in amber, but rather in porous sandstone?

What if "Scientists" are lying when they say they "know" that 
Dinosaur bones are mythions of years old 
-- 
as opposed to admitting that they merely believe they are...
based on their almost blind faith in the 
Biologically and Mathematically Impossible
  theory of evolution.

Rumor also has it that some Dinosaur Eggs from China 
are so fresh that they smell like Rotten Eggs.

What if two different Dinosaurs are clearly described  in the 
Old Testament Book of Job -- Chapters 40-41?   

One of which had a tail like a "cedar tree," ate grass like 
an ox, and had leg bones that were like "bars of iron"?  

If dinosaurs and man existed at the same time wouldn't this mean 
that the Geological Time Chart -- along with its "mythions of years" 
of evolution -- is almost certainly wrong?  

What if many thousands of Ancient Stones and pottery 
pieces from around the world portrayed Dinosaurs?   

What are the Ica Stones?  

Why is this evidence for a recent extinction of the Dinosaurs virtually 
ignored by the Mass Media and popular "science" publications?

Could it be that they want evolution taught in all public schools -- 
even though the public overwhelmingly believes in a Creator and disagrees 
with how this subject is (still to this day) being force-fed to our children?

And even though it can be proven that there must be a Creator? 

Why are the beliefs of the half (of Scientists) who believe in evolution so much 
more important than the beliefs of the other half, or of the average person?  

And why (pray tell) are the beliefs of the (other) 50% of Scientist's 
who DON'T Believe 
in evolution virtually ignored by the American Media?

Could it be that the mass media is more responsible for this
(mass-deception)
than the "scientists" themselves? 

Could it be that the way the media "reports" on this, or by the facts they 
choose NOT to report on, has had a detrimental effect, not only on the perception
 of the public at large, but also on our courts and children, -- who are still being 
taught in public schools (as if it were a fact) that God doesn't even exist?  

What if many different ancient civilizations from around the world have
 very similar legends of large creatures that resemble dinosaurs?   

What about the "legend" of Beowulf?  Was he an actual person of history, 
or a made-up character?  See also Dinosaurs and the Bible.

What if a living dinosaur was found in the Congo?  
What are the chances of such taking place?

What are the 12 animals that make up the Chinese New Year?   
Do any of them have anything to do with dinosaurs?  

Hugh Miller's Letter to the Editor

Did Birds Evolve From Dinosaurs?

Dog Sized Mammal found in Dinosaur Strata

Home School Expedition uncovers a 
near complete Allosaur, 
with unfossilized wood mixed in with the bones

Beaver found in Jurassic (Dino) Strata

For many more articles on Dinosaurs and Man Living together see: 
Evidence that Humans and Dinosaurs Lived Together at the same Time 

What if the "Missing" Mass in the Universe really is missing?   

Why would Astronomers continue to believe it exists  
when almost every observation says that it doesn't?   
   
Why is this imaginary substance so vital to the theory of  a 
"billions of years" old Earth  and  Universe?

 What the Public is NOT being told!

What if there never was a Big Bang?

See also: Big Bang Broken And Can't Be Fixed, by Amy Acheson

Continental Drift

What if the Continental Drift rate wasn't verified by direct measurements, 
but by the assumed accuracy and reliability of Potassium-Argon Dating?  

What if North America and Europe were (supposedly) divided in 
200,000,000 years while South America and Africa in 1/10th that time
 -- 
and are now moving in the wrong direction?

What if the actual drift rate of the San Andreas Fault  tells us it is 
less than 5,000 years old?

What if  only 10% of the American Public agrees with evolutionary theory as it is 
still taught in our Public Schools --  And that the Scientific Evidences for Creation 
(and/or against evolution) should also be taught in Public Schools?  

Would CBS or NBC or ABC or Even FOX News Report on it?   

And the Answer?

What if any honest Third Grader who has a copy of this little First-Grade Reader, 
(and actually reads it) would have to conclude that "Separation of Church and State" 
as it is now taught (rather spun) to the Public, is NOT what our Founding Fathers 
had in mind when they wrote the Constitution.
Take the Quiz

Did you know that the words "separation," "Church," or "State" 
Don't even appear in the Constitution?   

Did you also know that only a little over 100 years ago the U.S. Supreme Court 
said that the United States of America was "a Christian Nation" and that Prayers
 to God at all sorts of Public meetings and civic groups were common practice 
-- 
and Constitutional?   

Or that 1947 was the first year that the Supreme Court  issued a ruling 
in favor of forcing the individual states to comply with their 
re-interpretation of the First Amendment 
(which was directed at Congress) 
and took Jefferson's mention of the words 
"separation of church and state" 
(that appear in a letter to the Danbury Baptists)
out of their original context?  

In other words, what CONGRESS couldn't (and wouldn't) do by law, nine Supreme
 Court Judges did by re-interpreting the Constitution and applying to the states things
 that their predecessors never saw, and claimed for themselves powers that their 
predecessors never dared to claim.   

In other words, they legislated from the bench, 
and usurped the laws of all 50 states with the stroke of a pen.  

This, of course, should not mean that a State should be allowed to Force Christianity, 
or any other religion, down the throats of its constituents, for that is not freedom at 
all, and goes against the teachings of Christianity itself -- which allows people to reject 
their Creator and His rightful authority over their lives, while warning them of the 
consequences (that God has said such actions will bring).  But today it has been so
 reversed, that Christians are told that they can't even mention the word "God" in a 
public classroom -- even if their school assignment is to write a report about how they
 think we got here, and then asked (by the teacher) to read it in front of their class.

What if the Old and New Testaments were by far
the most well-documented writings of ancient history?  

And why do many people reject the Bible -- along with it's teachings 
and Warnings!!! -- without ever taking the time to read it for themselves, 
or investigating  (for themselves) whether or not it is true?   

Why do many people not want to believe it?
  Could it be because they Don't want to give control of their lives to anyone -- not even their own Creator 
-- 
even though He, Himself, went to great lengths to give us the opportunity to receive His greatest  gift: eternal life. 
 See John 3:16-21.

Does this mean that God will FORCE His "offer" of eternal life 
on an unwilling (or unthankful) person?   If you think so then...
  you don't know Him very well.

Quiz Page

Life Lessons

Love and Truth go Together